Engaging in meaningful science-stakeholder dialogues in polar and marine research
The call for research projects of direct societal relevance and the transference of scientific results to end-users has significantly increased over the past years. The globally growing competition for ocean resources and space as well as pressures on the marine environment have created an increasin...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Conference Object |
| Language: | unknown |
| Published: |
2016
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://epic.awi.de/id/eprint/42632/ https://hdl.handle.net/10013/epic.50447 |
| Summary: | The call for research projects of direct societal relevance and the transference of scientific results to end-users has significantly increased over the past years. The globally growing competition for ocean resources and space as well as pressures on the marine environment have created an increasing demand to meaningfully include stakeholders outside academia in research activities. Yet, despite an increase of dissemination and outreach efforts, these activities are often found to be lacking targeting and tailoring of the transferred information to the relevant audiences (European Commission, 2011). The communication efforts are therefore mostly one-dimensional and nondirectional, following the “deficit” model, which regards the lay-audience as passive receivers of information rather than individuals interpreting messages according to their personal and professional background, experiences and needs (Nisbet, 2009; Bauer, 2008; Bauer, Allum and Miller, 2007; Nisbet and Goidel, 2007; Scheufele, 2007). In most cases, this approach, however, limits understanding and sense-making of the given information (Moser, 2010). This study works from the premise that meaningful stakeholder engagement calls for dialogic communication processes, in which interests and expectations of the all actors are accounted for. For this analysis the subjective experiences of researchers obtained during various sciencestakeholder projects at the Alfred-Wegener-Institute Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Science, were gathered using semi-structured interviews. Projects were selected based on a content analysis of their respective abstracts, identifying those that stated the objective to engage with stakeholders. The in-depth project analysis showcases three common approaches to multi-stakeholder communication processes: 1. A limited one-dimensional communication model, in which the target audience was vaguely defined and messages were produced in a “one size fits all” matter without evaluation of the effects of provided information. 2. ... |
|---|