Board # 65 : Low-cost Fixed-wing Construction Techniques for UAS Curriculum

Low-Cost Fixed-Wing Construction Techniques for UAS Curriculum The UNIVERSITY CENTER, one of six FAA test sites, has a dual role of exploring the application of Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) to academic and scientific research, and in evaluating safety considerations and operating practices in order...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Michael C. Hatfield, Catherine F. Cahill, John Monahan
Format: Text
Language:unknown
Published: ASEE Conferences 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:http://peer.asee.org/27898
id ftaseepeer:oai:asee.org/27898
record_format openpolar
institution Open Polar
collection American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE): Papers on Engineering Education Repository (PEER)
op_collection_id ftaseepeer
language unknown
description Low-Cost Fixed-Wing Construction Techniques for UAS Curriculum The UNIVERSITY CENTER, one of six FAA test sites, has a dual role of exploring the application of Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) to academic and scientific research, and in evaluating safety considerations and operating practices in order to integrate UAS into the National Airspace Space. To meet these needs rapidly and efficiently, CENTER must integrate a wide variety of sensors onto UAS platforms in support of arctic research and public projects. In addition, some mission requirements dictate development of certain UAS components, or entire platforms, in order to satisfy necessary payload and flight performance characteristics. Central is the ability to rapidly create low-cost flight hardware utilizing 3D printing and composite layup techniques. To support the abbreviated fielding cycles often associated with arctic research and public safety missions, CENTER requires a rapid means of creating UAS components, both for rotary-wing and fixed-wing platforms. While rapid prototyping is commonly used in making components for widely popular rotary-wing UAS, much of this same technology may be harnessed and brought to bear on the design and fabrication of somewhat more complex fixed-wing aircraft in order to satisfy a broad set of mission flight envelopes. This approach has been applied to the development of fixed-wing UAS at the CENTER, such as the Lockheed Martin Stalker. While UNIVERSITY seeks to eventually develop an organic capability for constructing fixed-wing UAS of various shapes and sizes supporting a multitude of flight envelopes, this process may be applied to the repair or replacement of components for numerous UAS assets. The Stalker was selected as an initial testbed, as it fills a vital operational need, providing roughly 2 lbs payload for 2 hrs endurance. CENTER possesses a number of older Stalker airframes; however, these were provided after having exceeded their useful lifetime and most components no long flight worthy. By selecting an existing operational UAS for repair and study, CENTER is able to chart a logical path for technology development and flight certification purposes. Using a ‘crawl/walk/run’ approach, CENTER may incrementally develop technical expertise, first gaining basic skills in repairing existing components, then refining techniques necessary to build replacement components, and over time gaining the requisite knowledge and skills to build an entire UAS from scratch. In this way, students may methodically develop practical approaches for creating reliable, cost-efficient fixed-wing aircraft. On the other end of the spectrum, exposing students to challenging design projects in which particular performance characteristics must be highly optimized (eg, AIAA Design/Build/Fly competition), or the use of radically different construction techniques (eg, balsa wood ribs reinforced with carbon fiber tape, or mylar wing surfaces) can provide invaluable learning experiences which the student can then apply later design projects. By honing these techniques over time, in a less optimized and competitive environment, these techniques can lead to breakthroughs in practical UAS design methodology. With sufficient practice and experience, these skills allow students to build practical, low-cost UAS supporting a wide range of payload and flight envelope requirements. These can be matured and standardized to form a fleet of reliable, inexpensive UAS capable of satisfying numerous operational missions. What’s more, students are central to all aspects of the UAS lifecycle process, from mission inception through UAS development to mission accomplishment. Such experience is invaluable to providing students with key components of a quality UAS education and training program: mission requirements analysis, UAS design, flight operations, and data product generation. In addition, such a program is effective in generating student interest and support by industry and the local community. This paper will provide details of payloads/components fabricated for CENTER UAS assets supporting exciting arctic research, as well as lessons learned and efforts pushing this down to HS/MS students. Comment: 14 pages
format Text
author Michael C. Hatfield
Catherine F. Cahill
John Monahan
spellingShingle Michael C. Hatfield
Catherine F. Cahill
John Monahan
Board # 65 : Low-cost Fixed-wing Construction Techniques for UAS Curriculum
author_facet Michael C. Hatfield
Catherine F. Cahill
John Monahan
author_sort Michael C. Hatfield
title Board # 65 : Low-cost Fixed-wing Construction Techniques for UAS Curriculum
title_short Board # 65 : Low-cost Fixed-wing Construction Techniques for UAS Curriculum
title_full Board # 65 : Low-cost Fixed-wing Construction Techniques for UAS Curriculum
title_fullStr Board # 65 : Low-cost Fixed-wing Construction Techniques for UAS Curriculum
title_full_unstemmed Board # 65 : Low-cost Fixed-wing Construction Techniques for UAS Curriculum
title_sort board # 65 : low-cost fixed-wing construction techniques for uas curriculum
publisher ASEE Conferences
publishDate 2017
url http://peer.asee.org/27898
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
genre_facet Arctic
op_source 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, Ohio
op_rights ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2017 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference.
_version_ 1766336745300819968
spelling ftaseepeer:oai:asee.org/27898 2023-05-15T15:04:58+02:00 Board # 65 : Low-cost Fixed-wing Construction Techniques for UAS Curriculum Michael C. Hatfield Catherine F. Cahill John Monahan 2017-06-24 application/pdf http://peer.asee.org/27898 unknown ASEE Conferences ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2017 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, Ohio Text 2017 ftaseepeer 2018-12-28T19:03:38Z Low-Cost Fixed-Wing Construction Techniques for UAS Curriculum The UNIVERSITY CENTER, one of six FAA test sites, has a dual role of exploring the application of Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) to academic and scientific research, and in evaluating safety considerations and operating practices in order to integrate UAS into the National Airspace Space. To meet these needs rapidly and efficiently, CENTER must integrate a wide variety of sensors onto UAS platforms in support of arctic research and public projects. In addition, some mission requirements dictate development of certain UAS components, or entire platforms, in order to satisfy necessary payload and flight performance characteristics. Central is the ability to rapidly create low-cost flight hardware utilizing 3D printing and composite layup techniques. To support the abbreviated fielding cycles often associated with arctic research and public safety missions, CENTER requires a rapid means of creating UAS components, both for rotary-wing and fixed-wing platforms. While rapid prototyping is commonly used in making components for widely popular rotary-wing UAS, much of this same technology may be harnessed and brought to bear on the design and fabrication of somewhat more complex fixed-wing aircraft in order to satisfy a broad set of mission flight envelopes. This approach has been applied to the development of fixed-wing UAS at the CENTER, such as the Lockheed Martin Stalker. While UNIVERSITY seeks to eventually develop an organic capability for constructing fixed-wing UAS of various shapes and sizes supporting a multitude of flight envelopes, this process may be applied to the repair or replacement of components for numerous UAS assets. The Stalker was selected as an initial testbed, as it fills a vital operational need, providing roughly 2 lbs payload for 2 hrs endurance. CENTER possesses a number of older Stalker airframes; however, these were provided after having exceeded their useful lifetime and most components no long flight worthy. By selecting an existing operational UAS for repair and study, CENTER is able to chart a logical path for technology development and flight certification purposes. Using a ‘crawl/walk/run’ approach, CENTER may incrementally develop technical expertise, first gaining basic skills in repairing existing components, then refining techniques necessary to build replacement components, and over time gaining the requisite knowledge and skills to build an entire UAS from scratch. In this way, students may methodically develop practical approaches for creating reliable, cost-efficient fixed-wing aircraft. On the other end of the spectrum, exposing students to challenging design projects in which particular performance characteristics must be highly optimized (eg, AIAA Design/Build/Fly competition), or the use of radically different construction techniques (eg, balsa wood ribs reinforced with carbon fiber tape, or mylar wing surfaces) can provide invaluable learning experiences which the student can then apply later design projects. By honing these techniques over time, in a less optimized and competitive environment, these techniques can lead to breakthroughs in practical UAS design methodology. With sufficient practice and experience, these skills allow students to build practical, low-cost UAS supporting a wide range of payload and flight envelope requirements. These can be matured and standardized to form a fleet of reliable, inexpensive UAS capable of satisfying numerous operational missions. What’s more, students are central to all aspects of the UAS lifecycle process, from mission inception through UAS development to mission accomplishment. Such experience is invaluable to providing students with key components of a quality UAS education and training program: mission requirements analysis, UAS design, flight operations, and data product generation. In addition, such a program is effective in generating student interest and support by industry and the local community. This paper will provide details of payloads/components fabricated for CENTER UAS assets supporting exciting arctic research, as well as lessons learned and efforts pushing this down to HS/MS students. Comment: 14 pages Text Arctic American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE): Papers on Engineering Education Repository (PEER) Arctic