Propagation and Fluxes of Ultra High Energy Cosmic Rays in $f(R)$ Gravity Theory

In this work we study the effect of diffusion of ultra high energy (UHE) particles in presence of turbulent magnetic fields (TMFs) in the light of $f(R)$ theory of gravity. The $f(R)$ theory of gravity is a successful modified theory of gravity in explaining the various aspects of the observable Uni...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sarmah, Swaraj Pratim, Goswami, Umananda Dev
Format: Text
Language:unknown
Published: 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:http://arxiv.org/abs/2303.16678
Description
Summary:In this work we study the effect of diffusion of ultra high energy (UHE) particles in presence of turbulent magnetic fields (TMFs) in the light of $f(R)$ theory of gravity. The $f(R)$ theory of gravity is a successful modified theory of gravity in explaining the various aspects of the observable Universe including its current state of expansion. For this work we consider two most studied $f(R)$ gravity models, viz., the power-law model and the Starobinsky model. With these two models we study the diffusive character of propagation of UHE cosmic ray (UHECR) protons in terms of their density enhancement. The Greisen-Zatsepin-Kuzmin (GZK) cutoff, the dip and the bump are all spectrum characteristics that UHE extragalactic protons acquire when they propagate through the cosmic microwave background (CMB) radiation in presence of TMFs. We analyse all these characteristics through the diffusive flux as well as its modification factor. Model dependence of the modification factor is minimal compared to the diffusive flux. We compare the UHECR protons spectra that are calculated for the considered $f(R)$ gravity models with the available data of the AKENO-AGASA, HiRes, AUGER and YAKUTSK experiments of UHECRs. We see that both the models of $f(R)$ gravity provide the energy spectra of UHECRs with all experimentally observed features, which lay well within the range of combine data of all experiments throughout the energy range of concern, in contrast to the case of the $\Lambda$CDM model. Comment: 24 pages, 21 figures