Double Machine Learning and Automated Confounder Selection -- A Cautionary Tale
Double machine learning (DML) has become an increasingly popular tool for automated variable selection in high-dimensional settings. Even though the ability to deal with a large number of potential covariates can render selection-on-observables assumptions more plausible, there is at the same time a...
| Published in: | Journal of Causal Inference |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , |
| Format: | Text |
| Language: | unknown |
| Published: |
2021
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://arxiv.org/abs/2108.11294 https://doi.org/10.1515/jci-2022-0078 |
| Summary: | Double machine learning (DML) has become an increasingly popular tool for automated variable selection in high-dimensional settings. Even though the ability to deal with a large number of potential covariates can render selection-on-observables assumptions more plausible, there is at the same time a growing risk that endogenous variables are included, which would lead to the violation of conditional independence. This paper demonstrates that DML is very sensitive to the inclusion of only a few "bad controls" in the covariate space. The resulting bias varies with the nature of the theoretical causal model, which raises concerns about the feasibility of selecting control variables in a data-driven way. Comment: v4: published version |
|---|