Front- vs. back-illuminated CCD cameras for photometric surveys: a noise budget analysis

Exoplanetary transit and stellar oscillation surveys require a very high precision photometry. The instrumental noise has therefore to be minimized. First, we perform a semi-analytical model of different noise sources. We show that the noise due the CCD electrodes can be overcome using a Gaussian PS...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Astronomische Nachrichten
Main Authors: Crouzet, Nicolas, Guillot, Tristan, Fressin, Francois, Blazit, Alain
Format: Text
Language:unknown
Published: 2008
Subjects:
Astrophysics
Physics - Instrumentation and Detectors
Antarc*
Antarctica
Online Access:http://arxiv.org/abs/0809.4255
https://doi.org/10.1002/asna.200710820
Description
Summary:Exoplanetary transit and stellar oscillation surveys require a very high precision photometry. The instrumental noise has therefore to be minimized. First, we perform a semi-analytical model of different noise sources. We show that the noise due the CCD electrodes can be overcome using a Gaussian PSF (Point Spread Function) of full width half maximum larger than 1.6 pixels. We also find that for a PSF size of a few pixels, the photometric aperture has to be at least 2.5 times larger than the PSF full width half maximum. Then, we compare a front- with a back-illuminated CCD through a Monte-Carlo simulation. Both cameras give the same results for a PSF full width half maximum larger than 1.5 pixels. All these simulations are applied to the A STEP (Antarctica Search for Transiting Extrasolar Planets) project. As a result, we choose a front-illuminated camera for A STEP because of its better resolution and lower price, and we will use a PSF larger than 1.6 pixels.

Similar Items