Deciphering Patterns and Drivers of Heat and Carbon Storage in the Southern Ocean

The storage of anomalous heat and carbon in the Southern Ocean in response to increasing greenhouse gases greatly mitigates atmospheric warming and exerts a large impact on the marine ecosystem. However, the mechanisms driving the ocean storage patterns are uncertain. Here using recent hydrographic...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Geophysical Research Letters
Main Authors: Chen, Haidi, Morrison, Adele, Dufour, Carolina O., Sarmiento, Jorge L
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: American Geophysical Union
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1885/196725
https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL080961
https://openresearch-repository.anu.edu.au/bitstream/1885/196725/5/01_Chen_Deciphering_Patterns_and_2019.pdf.jpg
Description
Summary:The storage of anomalous heat and carbon in the Southern Ocean in response to increasing greenhouse gases greatly mitigates atmospheric warming and exerts a large impact on the marine ecosystem. However, the mechanisms driving the ocean storage patterns are uncertain. Here using recent hydrographic observations, we compare for the first time the spatial patterns of heat and carbon storage, which show substantial differences in the Southern Ocean, in contrast with the conventional view of simple passive subduction into the thermocline. Using an eddy‐rich global climate model, we demonstrate that redistribution of the preindustrial temperature field is the dominant control on the heat storage pattern, whereas carbon storage largely results from passive transport of anthropogenic carbon uptake at the surface. Lastly, this study highlights the importance of realistic representation of wind and surface buoyancy flux in climate models to improve future projection of circulation change and thus heat and carbon storage. This work was sponsored by Southern Ocean Carbon and Climate Observations and Modeling Project under the NSF Award PLR‐1425989 with additional support from NOAA and NASA. A. K. M. was supported by Australian Research Council Fellowship DE170100184. C. O. D. was supported by NASA Award NNX14AL40G and by the Princeton Environmental Institute Grand Challenge initiative.