Changes in the metabolic potential of the sponge microbiome under ocean acidification

• Other Authors: AIMS Data Centre (distributor), AIMS Data Centre (pointOfContact), Australian Institute of Marine Science (AIMS) (hasAssociationWith), Data Manager, AIMS Data Centre (hasAssociationWith), Webster, N (hasPrincipalInvestigator)
• Format: Dataset
• Language: unknown
• Published: Australian Ocean Data Network
• Subjects: oceans; Morrow; Milne Bay; Ocean acidification
• Online Access: https://researchdata.edu.au/changes-metabolic-potential-ocean-acidification/1438969

Maintenance and Update Frequency: asNeeded Statement: Sampling proceedures used in Milne Bay province of Papua New Guinea followed those described in: Morrow, K. M. et al. Natural volcanic CO2 seeps reveal future trajectories for host-microbial associations in corals and sponges. ISME J. 9, 894–908 (2015).\n Sampling processing and sequencing followed proceedures described in: Thomas, T. et al. Functional genomic signatures of sponge bacteria reveal unique and shared features of symbiosis. ISME J. 4, 1–11 (2010).\n Credit Wahab, M.A. A. (AIMS) Credit Botte, E.S. (AIMS) Credit Webster, N. Australian Institute of Marine Science (AIMS) This study investigated the changes occurring in the functional potential of the microbiome of two marine sponge species living in low pH, "acidified" waters and adjacent (~ 500m away) ,"control" waters, at shallow coral reefs CO2 seep sites in Papua New Guinea.\n Field work was carried out in the Milne Bay Province in the d'Entrecasteaux Channel in Papua New Guinea at a depth of 5m. Control site GPS coordinates: 9.828217 S 150.820517 E, Seep site GPS coordinates: 9.8241 S 150.825833 E.\n Three samples of each of two sponge species were collected. The species were Coelocarteria singaporensis and Stylissa flabelliformis. These particular species were chosen based on a previous study (Morrow et al., 2015) characterizeing the microbial communities of the 2 species at these particular field sites.\n Sample size of three samples per species was chosen based on the following criteria:\n 1) minimizing impact on the field site \n 2) accounting for statistical testing sample size requirements \n 3) space availability for storage in the field and during transport \n 4) cost (temporal and financial) of sample processing and sequencing\n Environmental data were collected over multiple expeditions as well as via remote loggers. Data was collected in August-2010, January 2013 and betweek December 2011-April 2014. For more information on environmental data for this study, please see ...