Upcast profiles from Seacat CTD on MacLane pump from R/V Oceanus cruises OC449-02, and OC449-03 in the Eastern Atlantic and Indian Oceans in 2008 (SIRENA project)

<p>CTD *Up cast* data from Lam SBE19plus (Seacat) attached to end of the MacLane pump line<br /> Note: These data not collected on R/V Islandia ISL0109 cruise<br /> <br /> PI's Note (09 May 2011):<br /> In comparing my pump seacat CTD to the ship's CTD, I'...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Phoebe J. Lam
Format: Dataset
Language:unknown
Published: Biological and Chemical Oceanography Data Management Office (BCO-DMO) 2011
Subjects:
Online Access:https://search.dataone.org/view/sha256:681d52202341e963756950df8a1f19025fec9c284504d0411184d19d7bb234b9
Description
Summary:<p>CTD *Up cast* data from Lam SBE19plus (Seacat) attached to end of the MacLane pump line<br /> Note: These data not collected on R/V Islandia ISL0109 cruise<br /> <br /> PI's Note (09 May 2011):<br /> In comparing my pump seacat CTD to the ship's CTD, I've discovered that the ship's CTD's fluorescence and beam attenuation are no good, at least for OC449-3.&nbsp; The ship's fluorometer was clearly just not working.&nbsp; The ship's transmissometer misbehaved in a more subtle manner--oceanographically consistent, but of a different pattern than my pump seacat data.&nbsp; I concluded that my pump seacat CTD's transmissometer is the &quot;correct&quot; one by comparing to discrete particulate carbon measurements on particles collected on my pumps.&nbsp; Both particulate carbon concentrations and beam attenuation from my pump seacat CTD show a minimum at 500m at OC449-3 station 3, whereas the ship's CTD shows an anomalous minimum in subsurface beam attenuation at station 2, which is not seem in the particulate carbon concentrations.</p>