Stable Isotopes and Planktonic Trophic Structure in Arctic Lakes

Actual food—web structure or function is difficult to determine based on visual observation, gut analyses, or the feeding interactions expected from a given list of species. We used C and N stable—isotope distributions to define food—web structure in arctic lakes, and we compared that structure with...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ecology
Main Authors: Kling, George W., Fry, Brian, O'Brien, W. John
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 1992
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1940762
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.2307%2F1940762
https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.2307/1940762
Description
Summary:Actual food—web structure or function is difficult to determine based on visual observation, gut analyses, or the feeding interactions expected from a given list of species. We used C and N stable—isotope distributions to define food—web structure in arctic lakes, and we compared that structure with results based on more traditional analyses. Although zooplankton species composition was similar across the eight lakes studied, the food—web structure varied greatly. In some lakes the copepod predator Heterocope fed on the herbivorous copepod Diaptomus as expected in a conventional food web. In most lakes, however, ° 1 5 N data were consistent with Heterocope functioning as an herbivore rather than a predator. These inferences were supported by evidence from carbon isotopes and energy—flow data. Our study indicates that only two or three trophic levels exist in the macrozoopolankton of these lakes, in comparison to five or six trophic levels reported in temperate lakes. Isotope analyses showed that actual food—web structure is poorly predicted from simple consideration of species lists and potential trophic interactions.