Are All Global Positioning System Collars Created Equal? Correcting Habitat‐Induced Bias Using Three Brands in the Central Canadian Rockies

• Published in: The Journal of Wildlife Management
• Main Authors: HEBBLEWHITE, M., PERCY, M., MERRILL, E. H.
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: Wiley 2007
• Subjects: Canada; Canis lupus
• Online Access: http://dx.doi.org/10.2193/2006-238; https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.2193%2F2006-238

Abstract: Global positioning system (GPS) collars are changing the face of wildlife research, yet they still possess biases such as habitat‐induced fix‐rate bias, which is a serious concern for habitat selection studies. We studied GPS bias in the Central Canadian Rockies, a critical area for wildlife conservation, to provide a statistical approach to correct GPS habitat bias for habitat selection studies using GPS collars. To model GPS habitat bias we deployed 11 different collars from 3 brands of GPS collars (Advanced Telemetry Systems [ATS], Asanti, MN; LOTEK Engineering Ltd., Newmarket, ON, Canada; and Televilt, Lindesberg, Sweden) in a random‐stratified design at 86 sites across habitat and topographic conditions. We modeled the probability of obtaining a successful location, P FIX , as a function of habitat, topography, and collar brand using mixed‐effects logistic regression in an information theoretic approach. For LOTEK collars, we also investigated the effect of 8 and 12 GPS channels on fix rate. The ATS collars had the highest overall fix rates (97.4%), followed by LOTEK 12 channel (94.5%), LOTEK 8 channel (85.6%), and Televilt (82.3%). Sufficient model selection uncertainty existed to warrant model averaging for logistic regression P FIX models. Collar brand influenced fix rate in all P FIX models: fix rates for ATS and LOTEK 12 channel were not statistically different, whereas LOTEK 8 channel receivers had intermediate fix rates, and Televilt had the lowest. Fix rate was reduced in aspen stands, closed coniferous stands, and sites in narrow mountainous valleys but was higher on upper mountain slopes. Slight discrepancies between fix rates from field trials and observed species fix rates (wolf [ Canis lupus ] and elk [ Cervus elaphus ]) suggest uncorrected behavioral or movement‐induced bias similar to other recent studies. Regardless, the strong habitat‐induced bias in GPS fix rates confirms that in our study area habitat effects are critical, especially for poorer performance brands. Based on ...