Polymerase Chain Reaction Amplification of Repetitive Intergenic Consensus and Repetitive Extragenic Palindromic Sequences for Molecular Typing of Pseudomonas anguilliseptica and Aeromonas salmonicida

• Published in: Journal of Aquatic Animal Health
• Main Authors: Beaz‐Hidalgo, Roxana, López‐Romalde, Sonia, Toranzo, Alicia E., Romalde, Jesús L.
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: Wiley 2008
• Subjects: Scophthalmus maximus; Turbot
• Online Access: http://dx.doi.org/10.1577/h07-007.1; https://afspubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1577/H07-007.1

Abstract The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of two molecular techniques, repetitive extragenic palindromic polymerase chain reaction (REP‐PCR) and repetitive intergenic consensus PCR (ERIC‐PCR), as epidemiological tools with which to discriminate among genetically distinct strains within two bacterial fish pathogens, Pseudomonas anguilliseptica and Aeromonas salmonicida. A total of 30 A. salmonicida and 52 P. anguilliseptica were analyzed. For P. anguilliseptica , three different major fingerprints were obtained with both techniques, which defined three genomic groups: one was composed of strains isolated from eels Anguilla spp., the second of strains from turbot Scophthalmus maximus and blackspot seabream (also known as red seabream) Pagellus bogaraveo , and the third of strains from other fish species, such as gilthead seabream (also known as gilthead bream) Sparus auratus , sea bass Dicentrarchus labrax (also known as European bass Morone labrax ), and salmonids. In the case of A. salmonicida , promising results were obtained with both techniques for subspecies differentiation. Thus, two genomic profiles were obtained by ERIC‐PCR. The first profile consisted of A. salmonicida subsp. salmonicida strains isolated from the different hosts. The second profile was composed of two A. salmonicida subsp. masoucida and one A. salmonicida subsp. achromogenes . Using REP‐PCR, three genotypes were obtained within this pathogen that were related to the diverse subspecies analyzed. In summary, both methodologies are useful for typing distinct strains associated with different host species and therefore are helpful in epidemiological studies of P. anguilliseptica . In contrast, in the case of A. salmonicida , more studies are needed to determine their utility in discriminating the subspecies salmonicida from the other two subspecies.