The Nordic governments' responses to the Covid‐19 pandemic: A comparative study of variation in governance arrangements and regulatory instruments

Abstract Government responses to the Covid‐19 pandemic in the Nordic states—Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, and Sweden—exhibit similarities and differences. This article investigates the extent to which crisis policymaking diverges from normal policymaking within the Nordic countries and whether...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Regulation & Governance
Main Authors: Christensen, Tom, Jensen, Mads Dagnis, Kluth, Michael, Kristinsson, Gunnar Helgi, Lynggaard, Kennet, Lægreid, Per, Niemikari, Risto, Pierre, Jon, Raunio, Tapio, Adolf Skúlason, Gústaf
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/rego.12497
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/rego.12497
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.1111/rego.12497
Description
Summary:Abstract Government responses to the Covid‐19 pandemic in the Nordic states—Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, and Sweden—exhibit similarities and differences. This article investigates the extent to which crisis policymaking diverges from normal policymaking within the Nordic countries and whether variations between the countries are associated with the role of expertise and the level of politicization. Government responses are analyzed in terms of governance arrangements and regulatory instruments. Findings demonstrate some deviation from normal policymaking within and considerable variation between the Nordic countries, as Denmark, Finland, and to some extent Norway exhibit similar patterns with hierarchical command and control governance arrangements, while Iceland, in some instances, resembles the case of Sweden, which has made use of network‐based governance. The article shows that the higher the influence of experts, the more likely it is that the governance arrangement will be network‐based.