Estimating canopy gross primary production by combining phloem stable isotopes with canopy and mesophyll conductances

Abstract Gross primary production (GPP) is a key component of the forest carbon cycle. However, our knowledge of GPP at the stand scale remains uncertain, because estimates derived from eddy covariance (EC) rely on semi‐empirical modelling and the assumptions of the EC technique are sometimes not fu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Plant, Cell & Environment
Main Authors: Vernay, Antoine, Tian, Xianglin, Chi, Jinshu, Linder, Sune, Mäkelä, Annikki, Oren, Ram, Peichl, Matthias, Stangl, Zsofia R., Tor‐Ngern, Pantana, Marshall, John D.
Other Authors: Kempestiftelserna, Knut och Alice Wallenbergs Stiftelse
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2020
Subjects:
Northern Sweden
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pce.13835
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fpce.13835
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/pce.13835
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.1111/pce.13835
Description
Summary:Abstract Gross primary production (GPP) is a key component of the forest carbon cycle. However, our knowledge of GPP at the stand scale remains uncertain, because estimates derived from eddy covariance (EC) rely on semi‐empirical modelling and the assumptions of the EC technique are sometimes not fully met. We propose using the sap flux/isotope method as an alternative way to estimate canopy GPP, termed GPP iso/SF , at the stand scale and at daily resolution. It is based on canopy conductance inferred from sap flux and intrinsic water‐use efficiency estimated from the stable carbon isotope composition of phloem contents. The GPP iso/SF estimate was further corrected for seasonal variations in photosynthetic capacity and mesophyll conductance. We compared our estimate of GPP iso/SF to the GPP derived from PRELES, a model parameterized with EC data. The comparisons were performed in a highly instrumented, boreal Scots pine forest in northern Sweden, including a nitrogen fertilized and a reference plot. The resulting annual and daily GPP iso/SF estimates agreed well with PRELES, in the fertilized plot and the reference plot. We discuss the GPP iso/SF method as an alternative which can be widely applied without terrain restrictions, where the assumptions of EC are not met.

Similar Items