Common mechanisms explain nitrogen‐dependent growth of Arctic shrubs over three decades despite heterogeneous trends and declines in soil nitrogen availability

Summary Heterogeneity has been observed in the responses of Arctic shrubs to climate variability over recent decades, which may reflect landscape‐scale variability in belowground resources. At a northern fringe of tall shrub expansion (Yuribei, Yamal Peninsula, Russia), we sought to determine the me...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:New Phytologist
Main Authors: Martin, Andrew C., Macias‐Fauria, Marc, Bonsall, Michael B., Forbes, Bruce C., Zetterberg, Pentti, Jeffers, Elizabeth S.
Other Authors: Natural Environment Research Council, Academy of Finland, European Commission, Oxford University Press
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nph.17529
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/nph.17529
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.1111/nph.17529
https://nph.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/nph.17529
Description
Summary:Summary Heterogeneity has been observed in the responses of Arctic shrubs to climate variability over recent decades, which may reflect landscape‐scale variability in belowground resources. At a northern fringe of tall shrub expansion (Yuribei, Yamal Peninsula, Russia), we sought to determine the mechanisms relating nitrogen (N) limitation to shrub growth over decadal time. We analysed the ratio of 15 N to 14 N isotopes in wood rings of 10 Salix lanata individuals (399 measurements) to reconstruct annual point‐based bioavailable N between 1980 and 2013. We applied a model‐fitting/model‐selection approach with a suite of competing ecological models to assess the most‐likely mechanisms that explain each shrub’s individual time‐series. Shrub δ 15 N time‐series indicated declining (seven shrubs), increasing (two shrubs) and no trend (one shrub) in N availability. The most appropriate model for all shrubs included N‐dependent growth of linear rather than saturating form. Inclusion of plant–soil feedbacks better explained ring width and δ 15 N for eight of 10 individuals. Although N trajectories were individualistic, common mechanisms of varying strength confirmed the N‐dependency of shrub growth. The linear mechanism may reflect intense scavenging of scarce N; the importance of plant–soil feedbacks suggests that shrubs subvert the microbial bottleneck by actively controlling their environment.