Morphometrics of mammal‐eating killer whales from drone photogrammetry, with comparison to sympatric fish‐eating killer whales in the eastern North Pacific
Abstract Aerial photogrammetry has provided increased power for monitoring the health of individuals in the endangered population of Southern Resident killer whales (SRKW, Orcinus orca ) in the eastern North Pacific. These data have shown evidence of nutritional stress, with individual growth and bo...
Published in: | Marine Mammal Science |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Other Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2022
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/mms.12965 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/mms.12965 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.1111/mms.12965 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/am-pdf/10.1111/mms.12965 |
Summary: | Abstract Aerial photogrammetry has provided increased power for monitoring the health of individuals in the endangered population of Southern Resident killer whales (SRKW, Orcinus orca ) in the eastern North Pacific. These data have shown evidence of nutritional stress, with individual growth and body condition correlating with the availability of their primary prey, Chinook salmon ( Oncorhynchus tshawytscha ). We used drones to derive similar but novel photogrammetry measurements from a sympatric population of mammal‐eating Bigg's killer whales (BKWs) that has been increasing in abundance in recent decades. From 2014 to 2019 we photographed 95 individual BKWs in Canadian waters off Vancouver Island and US waters in the Salish Sea; we estimated asymptotic lengths of 6.4 m for adult females and 7.3 m for adult males, both longer than corresponding length estimates for SRKWs. As a proxy for body condition, we measured head width at a standardized distance behind the blowhole, expressed as proportion of the length between the blowhole and dorsal fin, and estimated that on average, all age/sex classes of BKWs were more robust than corresponding classes of SRKWs. These differences likely reflect divergent adaptive selection in these prey‐specialist ecotypes, but may also partially indicate recent impacts of differential prey availability. |
---|