Eclogite with biotite porphyroblasts—Which conditions are responsible for their formation? An example from the northern Fleur‐de‐Lys Supergroup, Newfoundland, Canada
Abstract An eclogite from the Early Palaeozoic Fleur‐de‐Lys Supergroup in Newfoundland was studied because of its biotite porphyroblasts, which very rarely occur in this rock type. Thermodynamic modelling suggests that eclogitic biotite in common metabasite (former basalt–gabbro) is limited to (1) b...
| Published in: | Journal of Metamorphic Geology |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Other Authors: | |
| Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2024
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jmg.12755 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/jmg.12755 |
| Summary: | Abstract An eclogite from the Early Palaeozoic Fleur‐de‐Lys Supergroup in Newfoundland was studied because of its biotite porphyroblasts, which very rarely occur in this rock type. Thermodynamic modelling suggests that eclogitic biotite in common metabasite (former basalt–gabbro) is limited to (1) bulk‐rock compositions, which are relatively rich in Fe 2+ and K and poor in Fe 3+ , and (2) the low‐pressure range of the eclogite facies. The latter reason is supported by the determination of the pressure–temperature (P–T) path of the Newfoundland eclogite. Chemical zonation of garnet, presence of phengite with Si contents of ~3.4 per formula unit, Zr contents in rutile and petrographic observations resulted in a P–T trajectory starting at medium‐pressure conditions. Nearly isothermal burial led to a peak pressure of 18–19 kbar at ~575°C, followed by exhumation and slight heating. Deformation occurred at or close to the peak pressure. Subsequent introduction of hydrous fluids caused the formation of porphyroblasts of biotite and Ca–amphibole in the pressure range of 12–17 kbar at peak temperatures of 625–640°C. Retrogression led to very fine‐grained symplectites around omphacite and phengite and marginal replacement of biotite porphyroblasts by plagioclase and titanite. Geodynamic scenarios invoking either a flat subduction of oceanic crust followed by continent–continent collision or intracontinental subduction along a transpressional fault system might best explain the formation of eclogite with biotite porphyroblasts in general. For the Newfoundland eclogite, the latter scenario is preferred. |
|---|