The Distribution and Significance of Evaporitic Weathering Products on Antarctic Meteorites

• Published in: Meteoritics
• Main Author: Velbel, Michael Anthony
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: Wiley 1988
• Subjects: Antarctic; Antarc*
• Online Access: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1945-5100.1988.tb00910.x; https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fj.1945-5100.1988.tb00910.x; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1945-5100.1988.tb00910.x

Abstract— The distribution of white evaporitic deposits differs among different meteorite compositional groups and weathering categories of Antarctic meteorites. Evaporites occur with unusual frequency on carbonaceous chondrites, and are especially common in carbonaceous chondrites of weathering categories A and B. Among achondrites, weathering categories A and A/B show the most examples of evaporite weathering. Unlike carbonaceous chondrites and achondrites, most evaporite‐bearing ordinary (H and L) chondrites are from rustier meteorites of weathering categories B and, to a lesser degree, B/C and C. LL chondrites are conspicuous by their complete lack of any evaporitic weathering product. Almost two‐thirds of all evaporite‐bearing meteorites belong to weathering categories A, A/B, and B. Where chemical data are available, surficial evaporite deposits are associated with elemental anomalies in meteorite interiors. Meteorites of weathering classes B, A/B, and even A may have experienced significant element redistribution and/or contamination as a result of terrestrial exposure. Evaporite formation during terrestrial weathering cannot be neglected in geochemical, cosmochemical, and mineralogical studies of Antarctic meteorites. A lower‐case “e” should be added to the weathering classification of evaporite‐bearing Antarctic meteorites, to inform meteorite scientists of the presence of evaporite deposits and their associated compositional effects.