SOLAR ULTRAVIOLET RADIATION AT THE EARTH'S SURFACE

Abstract The biologically effective ultraviolet irradiance at the earth's surface varies with the elevation of the sun, the atmospheric ozone amount, and with the abundance of scatterers and absorbers of natural and anthropogenic origin. Taken alone, the reported decrease in column ozone over t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Photochemistry and Photobiology
Main Authors: Frederick, J. E., Snell, H. E., Haywood, E. K.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 1989
Subjects:
Physical and Theoretical Chemistry
General Medicine
Biochemistry
Antarc*
Antarctic
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-1097.1989.tb05548.x
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fj.1751-1097.1989.tb05548.x
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1751-1097.1989.tb05548.x
Description
Summary:Abstract The biologically effective ultraviolet irradiance at the earth's surface varies with the elevation of the sun, the atmospheric ozone amount, and with the abundance of scatterers and absorbers of natural and anthropogenic origin. Taken alone, the reported decrease in column ozone over the Northern Hemisphere between 1969 and 1986 implies an increase in erythemal irradiance at the ground of four percent or less during summer. However, an increase in tropospheric absorption, arising from polluting gases or particulates over localized areas, could more than offset the predicted enhancement in radiation. Any such extra absorption is likely to be highly regional in nature and does not imply that a decrease in erythemal radiation has occurred on a global basis. The Antarctic ‘ozone hole’ represents a special case in which a portion of the earth has experienced ultraviolet radiation levels during spring that are far in excess of those which prevailed prior to the present decade.

Similar Items