Using interviews to construct and disseminate knowledge of oral health policy

• Published in: International Journal of Dental Hygiene
• Main Authors: Clovis, JB, Brillant, MGS, Matthews, DC, Cobban, SJ, Romanow, PR, Filiaggi, MJ, McNally, ME
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: Wiley 2011
• Subjects: Canada; Dent; Newfoundland
• Online Access: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-5037.2011.00520.x; https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fj.1601-5037.2011.00520.x; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1601-5037.2011.00520.x

To cite this article: Int J Dent Hygiene 10 , 2012; 91–97 DOI: 10.1111/j.1601‐5037.2011.00520.x Clovis JB, Brillant MGS, Matthews DC, Cobban SJ, Romanow PR, Filiaggi MJ, McNally ME. Using interviews to construct and disseminate knowledge of oral health policy. Abstract: Objectives: Policymakers worldwide are challenged by the problem of oral health inequities. The goal of an interprovincial partnership in Canada was to guide policy aimed at improving the oral health of vulnerable populations. Insights regarding barriers and enablers to developing such policy in one province (Newfoundland & Labrador, Canada) were required to enhance collaboration between decision makers and researchers and to contribute to the evidence informing policy development. Methods: Snowball technique identified fourteen key informants. Semistructured audio‐recorded interviews were conducted in person or by telephone. Two researchers independently conducted the analyses of the transcribed interviews, one using NVivo software and the second, manual coding. Triangulation of the analyses confirmed the findings. Results: Agreement between the two approaches showed that most key informants believed that oral health is an important policy issue; however, most felt it was not a high priority among the general public and most were unable to articulate the policy process. Barriers to oral health becoming a governmental priority were related to resource allocation and to poor communication among some groups including dentists and dental hygienists. Current government programmes and initiatives were praised but considered weak in health promotion strategies. Recommendations for enhancing oral health priority varied. Conclusions: Attention to the methodological considerations of qualitative research enhanced the credibility of the method and confidence in the findings. Leveraging of existing programmes and improving communication were recommended to contribute to raising the priority of oral health within the government, thereby increasing their ...