Elemental analysis of otoliths, fin rays and scales: a comparison of bony structures to provide population and life‐history information for the Arctic grayling ( Thymallus arcticus)

• Published in: Ecology of Freshwater Fish
• Main Authors: Clarke, A. D., Telmer, K. H., Mark Shrimpton, J.
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: Wiley 2007
• Subjects: Ecology; Aquatic Science; Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics; Arctic grayling; Arctic; Thymallus arcticus
• Online Access: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0633.2007.00232.x; https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fj.1600-0633.2007.00232.x; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1600-0633.2007.00232.x

Abstract – We used laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry line scans to determine the elemental composition of otoliths, pectoral fin rays and scales of Arctic grayling. Elemental signatures of otoliths and pectoral fin rays effectively provide life‐history information on individual fish, important for management of grayling, and potentially all freshwater teleosts. Bulk elemental signatures measured in the otoliths and fin rays were highly correlated to the stream chemistries where the fish were captured. A surprising result of this study was that fin rays showed the strongest relationship with water chemistry for strontium. Scale strontium concentrations were not correlated to water chemistries suggesting that other physiological mechanisms, or remobilisation, may be influencing the deposition of trace elements within scales. Linear discriminant function analyses for otolith and fin ray elemental signatures (and intriguingly also for scales) separated fish from different rivers for all three structures; thus, this technique can be used effectively as a means to discriminate origin of capture.