Goose grazing selectivity along a depletion gradient

• Published in: Ecography
• Main Authors: Therkildsen, Ole R., Madsen, Jesper
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: Wiley 1999
• Subjects: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics; Anser brachyrhynchus; Branta leucopsis
• Online Access: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.1999.tb01280.x; https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fj.1600-0587.1999.tb01280.x; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1600-0587.1999.tb01280.x

The micro‐habilat food selectivity along a gradient of increasing grazing intensity of wintering pink‐footed geese Anser brachyrhynchus and barnacle geese Branta leucopsis foraging on winter wheat Triticum aestivum and smooth meadow grass Poa pratensis was investigated. Protein content of ungrazed primary and secondary leaves of winter wheat did not differ, whereas the protein content of tertiary leaves was significantly lower. Secondary leaves were significantly longer than both primary and tertiary leaves, whereas tertiary leaves were significantly longer than primary leaves. Protein content of primary and secondary leaves of Poa pratensis did not differ, whereas the protein content of tertiary leaves was significantly lower. Primary leaves were significantly shorter than both secondary and tertiary leaves, which did not differ significantly. For all leaf categories, there was an increase in the removal with increasing goose grazing intensity. The geese showed a sequential selection of winter wheat leaves according to the protein content, initially preferring primary and secondary leaves, but increasingly selecting tertiary leaves of poorer quality as high‐quality leaves became depleted. Foraging on Poa pratensis. geese selected secondary leaves according to the protein content, whereas tertiary leaves were preferred to primary leaves, although these had a protein content equal to secondary leaves. This, however, may be explained by the primary leaves being too short to maintain intake rates. It is concluded that feeding preferences cannot be established on the basis of protein contents of food plants alone and that green biomass estimates not necessarily reflect resource availability.