Science and International Environmental Nonregimes: The Case of Arctic Haze
Abstract Dimitrov et al. argue that nonregimes are a worthy object of research attention that can contribute to international regime theory. Case studies, however, are still sparse. In this article, I examine Arctic haze, an issue area where a transnational environmental problem existed but no regim...
| Published in: | Review of Policy Research |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2011
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.2011.00486.x https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fj.1541-1338.2011.00486.x https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1541-1338.2011.00486.x |
| Summary: | Abstract Dimitrov et al. argue that nonregimes are a worthy object of research attention that can contribute to international regime theory. Case studies, however, are still sparse. In this article, I examine Arctic haze, an issue area where a transnational environmental problem existed but no regime formed. Arctic haze was (re‐)discovered in 1971 but by 2000, the window of opportunity to form a regime had closed. What factors explain why an Arctic haze regime was not formed between 1971 and 2000? I claim science‐based factors play the dominant role. An analytical approach applicable to the science‐policy interface was employed. Using this approach, I conclude that the Arctic haze nonregime is best explained by the absence of scientifically documented and compelling transboundary consequences to ecosystems and humans. This is a product of the unique nature of the Arctic atmosphere. |
|---|