Depth‐stratified community zonation patterns on Gulf of Alaska rocky shores

• Published in: Marine Ecology
• Main Authors: Konar, Brenda, Iken, Katrin, Edwards, Matthew
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: Wiley 2009
• Subjects: Gulf of Alaska; Kachemak; Kodiak; Alaska
• Online Access: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0485.2008.00259.x; https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fj.1439-0485.2008.00259.x; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1439-0485.2008.00259.x

Abstract Vertical zonation patterns have been considered ubiquitous in intertidal ecosystems but questions remain about their generality for individual taxonomic groups and over broad spatial scales, and whether they continue into adjacent shallow subtidal habitats. Taxon richness, invertebrate abundance, and macroalgal biomass were examined in the summer of 2003 along a vertical gradient in the rocky intertidal and shallow subtidal habitats around Kodiak Island, Kachemak Bay, and Prince William Sound, all within the Gulf of Alaska. Replicate samples of benthic organisms were taken in the high (∼ 7 m), mid (∼ 4 m) and low (∼ 0 m) intertidal (relative to MLLW), and at 1, 5, 10 and 15 m water depths at three sites in each region, and identified to the lowest possible taxonomic level. Our primary goals were to assess (1) how estimates of taxon richness, invertebrate abundance, and macroalgal biomass vary among intertidal heights and subtidal depths and (2) how general these patterns are when considered across the Gulf of Alaska. Our results show that when all invertebrates were considered together, most of the variation in taxon richness was accounted for by differences among depths ( i.e. intertidal heights and subtidal depths) (∼ 51%), and among replicate samples within each depth (∼ 26%). Little to none of the variation was accounted for by differences among sites within each region (∼ 1%) or among regions themselves (∼ 0%). When considered across the Gulf of Alaska, total taxon richness and organism abundance were greatest in the low intertidal/shallow subtidal and decreased with increasing height/depth. When separated by phylum and examined together with macroalgae, variation in abundance and/or biomass among depths was significant and accounted for most of the variability. Differences among regions and sites within each region were not significant and accounted for little to none of the variance. Because the pattern of zonation varied among sites within each region, it reduced the generality of a single ...