High yield and rapid growth of Neoparamoeba pemaquidensis in co‐culture with a rainbow trout gill‐derived cell line RTgill‐W1

• Published in: Journal of Fish Diseases
• Main Authors: Lee, L E J, Van Es, S J, Walsh, S K, Rainnie, D J, Donay, N, Summerfield, R, Cawthorn, R J
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: Wiley 2006
• Subjects: Atlantic salmon
• Online Access: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2761.2006.00740.x; https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2761.2006.00740.x; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1365-2761.2006.00740.x

Abstract Neoparamoeba pemaquidensis is an ubiquitous amphizoic marine protozoan and has been implicated as the causative agent for several diseases in marine organisms, most notably amoebic gill disease (AGD) in Atlantic salmon. Despite several reports on the pathology of AGD, relatively little is known about the protozoan and its relationship to host cells. In this study, an in vitro approach using monolayers of a rainbow trout gill cell line (RTgill‐W1, ATCC CRL‐2523) was used to rapidly grow large numbers of N. pemaquidensis (ATCC 50172) and investigate cell–pathogen interactions. Established cell lines derived from other tissues of rainbow trout and other fish species were also evaluated for amoeba growth support. The amoebae showed preference and highest yield when grown with RTgill‐W1 over nine other tested fish cell lines. Amoeba yields could reach as high as 5 × 10 5 cells mL −1 within 3 days of growth on the gill cell monolayers. The amoebae caused visible focal lesions in RTgill‐W1 monolayers within 24 h of exposure and rapidly proliferated and spread with cytopathic effects destroying the neighbouring pavement‐like cells within 48–72 h after initial exposure in media above 700 mOsm kg −1 . Disruption of the integrity of the gill cell monolayers could be noted within 30 min of exposure to the amoeba suspensions by changes in transepithelial resistance (TER) compared with control cell monolayers maintained in the exposure media. This was significantly different by 2 h ( P < 0.05) compared with control cells and remained significantly different ( P < 0.01) for the remaining 72 h that the TER was monitored. The RTgill‐W1 cell line is thus a convenient model for growing N. pemaquidensis and for studying host–pathogen interactions in AGD.