Body size and predatory performance in wolves: is bigger better?
Summary Large body size hinders locomotor performance in ways that may lead to trade‐offs in predator foraging ability that limit the net predatory benefit of larger size. For example, size‐related improvements in handling prey may come at the expense of pursuing prey and thus negate any enhancement...
| Published in: | Journal of Animal Ecology |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , |
| Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2009
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2008.01517.x https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2656.2008.01517.x https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2008.01517.x |
| Summary: | Summary Large body size hinders locomotor performance in ways that may lead to trade‐offs in predator foraging ability that limit the net predatory benefit of larger size. For example, size‐related improvements in handling prey may come at the expense of pursuing prey and thus negate any enhancement in overall predatory performance due to increasing size. This hypothesis was tested with longitudinal data from repeated observations of 94 individually known wolves ( Canis lupus ) hunting elk ( Cervus elaphus ) in Yellowstone National Park, USA. Wolf size was estimated from an individually based sex‐specific growth model derived from body mass measurements of 304 wolves. Larger size granted individual wolves a net predatory advantage despite substantial variation in its effect on the performance of different predatory tasks; larger size improved performance of a strength‐related task (grappling and subduing elk) but failed to improve performance of a locomotor‐related task (selecting an elk from a group) for wolves > 39 kg. Sexual dimorphism in wolf size also explained why males outperformed females in each of the three tasks considered (attacking, selecting, and killing). These findings support the generalization that bigger predators are overall better hunters, but they also indicate that increasing size ultimately limits elements of predatory behaviour that require superior locomotor performance. We argue that this could potentially narrow the dietary niche of larger carnivores as well as limit the evolution of larger size if prey are substantially more difficult to pursue than to handle. |
|---|