Headspace Gas Chromatography‐Mass Spectrometry and Electronic Nose Analysis of Volatile Compounds in Canned Alaska Pink Salmon Having Various Grades of Watermarking

ABSTRACT Volatiles in canned pink salmon, produced from different degrees of skin watermarked raw material and stored for 2 and 9 mo, were characterized and compared using static headspace gas chromatography analysis coupled to a mass spectrometer (SHGCMS). Sulfur‐containing compounds comprised 30%...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Food Science
Main Authors: Oliveira, Alexandra C.M., Crapo, Charles A., Himelbloom, Brian, Vorholt, Carey, Hoffert, Jennifer
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2005
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2005.tb11486.x
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2621.2005.tb11486.x
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/wol1/doi/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2005.tb11486.x/fullpdf
Description
Summary:ABSTRACT Volatiles in canned pink salmon, produced from different degrees of skin watermarked raw material and stored for 2 and 9 mo, were characterized and compared using static headspace gas chromatography analysis coupled to a mass spectrometer (SHGCMS). Sulfur‐containing compounds comprised 30% to 50% of the total volatiles and tended to decrease with increasing degrees of skin watermarking, and dimethyl sulfide was the most abundant compound of this class of molecules. A few alcohols, aldehydes, ketones, and furans were also identified. Forward stepwise general discriminant analysis (FSGDA) was used to investigate prediction models based on degree of skin watermarking. The 2‐ and 9‐mo models using SHGCMS showed 92.5% and 93.75% correct classifications, respectively. The ability of the Cyranose 320, a hand‐held electronic nose (EN), to differentiate these grades of watermarking in the canned samples was also tested. EN analysis using FSGDA resulted in models with 90% and 92.5% correct classifications for the 2‐ and 9‐mo samples, respectively. Overall, results indicate that the watermarking grades studied are not readily distinguishable from each other by either method of analysis.