Evidence for genetic differences in the offspring of two sympatric morphs of Arctic charr

The sub‐arctic Lake Fjellfrøsvatn, northern Norway, has two morphs of Arctic charr that are reproductively isolated because they spawn 5 months apart. The smaller morph (≤14 cm L F ) is confined to the profundal zone of the lake and the larger morph is mainly littoral. Three hypotheses were tested:...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Fish Biology
Main Authors: Klemetsen, A., Elliott, J. M., Knudsen, R., Sørensen, P.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2002
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2002.tb02419.x
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fj.1095-8649.2002.tb02419.x
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2002.tb02419.x
Description
Summary:The sub‐arctic Lake Fjellfrøsvatn, northern Norway, has two morphs of Arctic charr that are reproductively isolated because they spawn 5 months apart. The smaller morph (≤14 cm L F ) is confined to the profundal zone of the lake and the larger morph is mainly littoral. Three hypotheses were tested: (i) the offspring of the profundal Arctic charr grow slower than the offspring of the littoral Arctic charr under identical conditions, thus indicating a genetic basis for the slow growth of the profundal Arctic charr in the wild; (ii) the wild phenotypes of the two morphs are morphometrically different and the differences are persistent in the offspring; (iii) the offspring of the two morphs have different behaviour traits under similar treatments. The first hypothesis was rejected; offspring of the profundal morph grew slightly better than offspring of the littoral morph at 10° C in the laboratory. The second and third hypotheses were supported by the data. Wild‐caught fish of the two morphs differed in several morphometric characters and most of the differences persisted in the offspring. In the laboratory, offspring of the littoral morph were more active, more aggressive and more pelagic than offspring of the profundal morph and naive offspring of the profundal morph were more effective in eating live chironomid larvae than were offspring of the littoral morph. The data for morphometry and behaviour, but not growth, provide evidence for genetic differences between the two Arctic charr morphs of Fjellfrøsvatn.