Reply to the comments of Ryman et al.
If we want to address ‘genetic concerns’ we should not forget the issue of ‘mental concerns’ in the process. Nyman & Ring (1989) set out to display how a couple of polymorphic loci in Arctic charr ( Salvelinus alpinus L.) may and will be used as standard genetic tags for studies on hatchery and...
| Published in: | Journal of Fish Biology |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
1993
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.1993.tb00353.x https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fj.1095-8649.1993.tb00353.x https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1095-8649.1993.tb00353.x |
| Summary: | If we want to address ‘genetic concerns’ we should not forget the issue of ‘mental concerns’ in the process. Nyman & Ring (1989) set out to display how a couple of polymorphic loci in Arctic charr ( Salvelinus alpinus L.) may and will be used as standard genetic tags for studies on hatchery and wild populations. However, Ryman et al . (1993) address ‘conceptual misunderstandings’ of a general nature. Instead of discussing all the detailed points raised by Ryman et al ., I have tried below to address the major issues in Nyman and Ring's original paper. |
|---|