Post‐larval growth in the lateral white muscle of the eel, Anguilla anguilla

• Published in: Journal of Fish Biology
• Main Authors: Romanello, M. G., Scapolo, P. A., Luprano, S., Mascarello, F.
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: Wiley 1987
• Subjects: Anguilla anguilla
• Online Access: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.1987.tb05742.x; https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fj.1095-8649.1987.tb05742.x; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1095-8649.1987.tb05742.x

The post‐larval growth of lateral white muscle was studied in eels at different stages of post‐larval development (glass, yellow and silver eels) by means of histochemical methods for myosin‐ATPase (mATPase) activity, immunohistochemistry (for myosin isoforms) and electron microscopy. Morphological, histo‐ and immunohistochemical data reveal a uniform appearance of white muscle in glass eels, whereas in following stages the typical mosaic appearance is present. Small‐diameter fibres show a more acid‐labile mATPase activity than large fibres and react with anti‐F, anti‐FHC and anti‐S sera, but not with anti‐SHC serum. In the silver stage, the small fibres tend to decrease in number as the size of the eels increases. Electron microscopy reveals the presence of satellite cells at every stage: in glass eels there are also ‘activated’ elements showing scarce myofilaments in their cytoplasm; in yellow eels very small fibres are present, enveloped within the basal lamina of well‐differentiated muscle fibres; in silver eels there are no fibres showing signs of immaturity. Presumably the post‐larval development of white muscle involves in juvenile eels a substantial recruitment of fibres from the satellite cell population; later the hyperplasia decreases or ceases and hypertrophy remains the only mechanism for muscle growth.