Lack of competition between barnacle geese Branta leucopsis and pink‐footed geese Anser brachyrhynchus during the pre‐breeding period in Svalbard

• Published in: Journal of Avian Biology
• Main Authors: Fox, Anthony D., Bergersen, Espen
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: Wiley 2005
• Subjects: Animal Science and Zoology; Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics; Sassendalen; Svalbard; Anser brachyrhynchus; Barnacle goose; Branta leucopsis
• Online Access: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0908-8857.2005.03540.x; https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fj.0908-8857.2005.03540.x; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.0908-8857.2005.03540.x

The feeding ecology of barnacle geese and pink‐footed geese was studied in Sassendalen, Svalbard during the pre‐nesting period (late May) to assess the potential for inter‐specific competition. Barnacle geese fed almost exclusively (97%) by grazing above‐ground plant material, mostly (79%) along snow edges in moss‐mat habitats. Pink‐footed geese fed mostly (93%) by excavating below‐ground parts of plants, mostly (56%) away from snow and were more evenly distributed between habitat types. Barnacle goose faeces contained mostly (62%) moss, that of pink‐footed geese mostly (48%) below‐ground plant storage organs (especially Bistorta viviparum L.). Principal components analysis of dropping contents showed no overlap in species diet in allopatry or sympatry. There was little overlap in diet and feeding ecology of the two species at this pre‐nesting feeding site. Hence, unless increased goose feeding densities affect future vegetation density and composition, under present circumstances, increasing numbers of either species is unlikely to affect foraging conditions for the other at this important stage in the annual cycle. However, such changes could have local density‐dependent intra‐specific effects.