The animal reservoir of Tunga penetrans in severely affected communities of north‐east Brazil

Abstract. Tungiasis is a zoonotic ectoparasitosis caused by the sand flea Tunga penetrans L. (Siphonaptera: Tungidae) . This disease is hyperendemic in poor communities of north‐east Brazil, causing considerable morbidity in affected human populations, but the animal reservoirs have not been investi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Medical and Veterinary Entomology
Main Authors: Heukelbach, J., Costa, A. M. L., Wilcke, T., Mencke, N., Feldmeier, H.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2004
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0269-283x.2004.00532.x
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fj.0269-283X.2004.00532.x
Description
Summary:Abstract. Tungiasis is a zoonotic ectoparasitosis caused by the sand flea Tunga penetrans L. (Siphonaptera: Tungidae) . This disease is hyperendemic in poor communities of north‐east Brazil, causing considerable morbidity in affected human populations, but the animal reservoirs have not been investigated previously in Brazil. To assess the prevalence and intensity of T. penetrans infection in domestic and peri‐domestic animals, as well as in the human population, we surveyed two typical communities of north‐east Brazil: an urban slum and a traditional fishing village. In the slum we examined 849 humans, 121 cats, 82 dogs, 2 pigs, 2 rabbits, 1 monkey and 56 rodents, comprising 34 rats ( Rattus rattus L.) and 22 mice ( Mus domesticus L). In the fishing village we examined 505 humans, 68 dogs, 37 cats, 7 donkeys, 4 cattle, 3 pigs and 1 monkey. Tungiasis was common among dogs and cats of both communities, with respective prevalence rates of 67.1% (95% CI: 55.8–77.1) and 30.9% (95% CI: 20.2–43.3) in dogs, 49.6% (95% CI: 40.4–58.8) and 32.4% (95% CI: 18.0–49.8) in cats. Slum rats were 41.2% (95% CI: 24.6–59.3) infested, but the other animals were not. Human prevalence rates were 54.4% (95% CI: 51.0–57.8) in the slum and 52.1% (95% CI: 47.6–56.5) in the fishing village. High prevalence rates (range 31–67%) of tungiasis in humans, pets and rats (but apparently not other animals) indicate the need for an eco‐epidemiological approach to control of this anthropo‐zoonotic problem.