No evidence for sex bias in winter inter‐site movements in an Arctic‐nesting goose population

Understanding movement of individuals between sites is necessary to quantify emigration and immigration, yet previous analyses exploring sex biases in site fidelity among birds have not evaluated remigration (the return of marked birds that moved to alternative areas from the site at which they were...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ibis
Main Authors: Weegman, Mitch D., Fox, Anthony D., Bearhop, Stuart, Hilton, Geoff M., Walsh, Alyn J., Cleasby, Ian R., Hodgson, David J.
Other Authors: Phillips, Richard, Wildfowl & Wetlands Trust
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ibi.12246
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fibi.12246
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/ibi.12246
Description
Summary:Understanding movement of individuals between sites is necessary to quantify emigration and immigration, yet previous analyses exploring sex biases in site fidelity among birds have not evaluated remigration (the return of marked birds that moved to alternative areas from the site at which they were marked). Using novel Bayesian multistate models, we tested whether between‐winter emigration, remigration and survival rates were sex‐biased among 851 Greenland White‐fronted Geese Anser albifrons flavirostris marked at Wexford, Ireland. We found no evidence for sex biases in emigration, remigration or survival. Thus, sex biases in winter site fidelity do not occur in any form in this population; these techniques for modelling sex‐biased movement will be useful for a better understanding of site fidelity and connectivity in other marked animal populations.