Biochar increases tree biomass in a managed boreal forest, but does not alter N 2 O, CH 4 , and CO 2 emissions

Abstract Biochar soil amendment may provide the forestry sector with a formidable tool to simultaneously sequester carbon (C) in the soil and aboveground by enhancing plant productivity, yet several key uncertainties remain. Crucially, empirical evidence of long‐term effects of biochar management on...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:GCB Bioenergy
Main Authors: Grau‐Andrés, Roger, Pingree, Melissa R. A., Öquist, Mats G., Wardle, David A., Nilsson, Marie‐Charlotte, Gundale, Michael J.
Other Authors: Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12864
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/gcbb.12864
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.1111/gcbb.12864
Description
Summary:Abstract Biochar soil amendment may provide the forestry sector with a formidable tool to simultaneously sequester carbon (C) in the soil and aboveground by enhancing plant productivity, yet several key uncertainties remain. Crucially, empirical evidence of long‐term effects of biochar management on vegetation and on greenhouse gas emissions in forest ecosystems is scarce. Using a large field experiment in a young managed boreal forest in northern Sweden, we investigated the effects of biochar (applied either on the soil surface or mixed in the soil 8–9 years prior to this study) on supply rates of soil nutrients, on survival and growth of planted Pinus sylvestris , on community composition of the understory vegetation, and on forest floor fluxes of N 2 O, CH 4 , and CO 2 . We found that biochar promoted P . sylvestris survival only when biochar was applied on the soil surface. Conversely, biochar enhanced P . sylvestris growth overall, resulting in a 19% increase in C stored in biomass. Biochar also altered the composition of the understory vegetation, especially when mixed into the soil, and promoted a more resource‐conservative community (i.e., with more ericaceous shrubs and less graminoids and forbs). Meanwhile, supply rates of the main soil nutrients were largely unaffected by biochar. Finally, we found that biochar did not alter overall N 2 O and CO 2 emissions and CH 4 uptake from the forest floor. Our findings show that biochar amendment increased the net C input to the system, since, besides directly increasing soil C stocks, biochar enhanced biomass growth without increasing soil C losses. Therefore, our study suggests that biochar could potentially be used for emissions abatement in intensively managed boreal forests.