Modeled production, oxidation, and transport processes of wetland methane emissions in temperate, boreal, and Arctic regions

Abstract Wetlands are the largest natural source of methane (CH 4 ) to the atmosphere. The eddy covariance method provides robust measurements of net ecosystem exchange of CH 4 , but interpreting its spatiotemporal variations is challenging due to the co‐occurrence of CH 4 production, oxidation, and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Global Change Biology
Main Authors: Ueyama, Masahito, Knox, Sara H., Delwiche, Kyle B., Bansal, Sheel, Riley, William J., Baldocchi, Dennis, Hirano, Takashi, McNicol, Gavin, Schafer, Karina, Windham‐Myers, Lisamarie, Poulter, Benjamin, Jackson, Robert B., Chang, Kuang‐Yu, Chen, Jiquen, Chu, Housen, Desai, Ankur R., Gogo, Sébastien, Iwata, Hiroki, Kang, Minseok, Mammarella, Ivan, Peichl, Matthias, Sonnentag, Oliver, Tuittila, Eeva‐Stiina, Ryu, Youngryel, Euskirchen, Eugénie S., Göckede, Mathias, Jacotot, Adrien, Nilsson, Mats B., Sachs, Torsten
Other Authors: Department of Water Resources, Rural Development Administration, U.S. Department of Energy, U.S. Geological Survey
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gcb.16594
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/gcb.16594
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.1111/gcb.16594
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/am-pdf/10.1111/gcb.16594
Description
Summary:Abstract Wetlands are the largest natural source of methane (CH 4 ) to the atmosphere. The eddy covariance method provides robust measurements of net ecosystem exchange of CH 4 , but interpreting its spatiotemporal variations is challenging due to the co‐occurrence of CH 4 production, oxidation, and transport dynamics. Here, we estimate these three processes using a data‐model fusion approach across 25 wetlands in temperate, boreal, and Arctic regions. Our data‐constrained model—iPEACE—reasonably reproduced CH 4 emissions at 19 of the 25 sites with normalized root mean square error of 0.59, correlation coefficient of 0.82, and normalized standard deviation of 0.87. Among the three processes, CH 4 production appeared to be the most important process, followed by oxidation in explaining inter‐site variations in CH 4 emissions. Based on a sensitivity analysis, CH 4 emissions were generally more sensitive to decreased water table than to increased gross primary productivity or soil temperature. For periods with leaf area index (LAI) of ≥20% of its annual peak, plant‐mediated transport appeared to be the major pathway for CH 4 transport. Contributions from ebullition and diffusion were relatively high during low LAI (<20%) periods. The lag time between CH 4 production and CH 4 emissions tended to be short in fen sites (3 ± 2 days) and long in bog sites (13 ± 10 days). Based on a principal component analysis, we found that parameters for CH 4 production, plant‐mediated transport, and diffusion through water explained 77% of the variance in the parameters across the 19 sites, highlighting the importance of these parameters for predicting wetland CH 4 emissions across biomes. These processes and associated parameters for CH 4 emissions among and within the wetlands provide useful insights for interpreting observed net CH 4 fluxes, estimating sensitivities to biophysical variables, and modeling global CH 4 fluxes.