Meta‐analysis of multiple driver effects on marine phytoplankton highlights modulating role ofp CO 2
Abstract Responses of marine primary production to a changing climate are determined by a concert of multiple environmental changes, for example in temperature, light, p CO 2 , nutrients, and grazing. To make robust projections of future global marine primary production, it is crucial to understand...
| Published in: | Global Change Biology |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , |
| Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2020
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15341 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/gcb.15341 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.1111/gcb.15341 |
| Summary: | Abstract Responses of marine primary production to a changing climate are determined by a concert of multiple environmental changes, for example in temperature, light, p CO 2 , nutrients, and grazing. To make robust projections of future global marine primary production, it is crucial to understand multiple driver effects on phytoplankton. This meta‐analysis quantifies individual and interactive effects of dual driver combinations on marine phytoplankton growth rates. Almost 50% of the single‐species laboratory studies were excluded because central data and metadata (growth rates, carbonate system, experimental treatments) were insufficiently reported. The remaining data (42 studies) allowed for the analysis of interactions of p CO 2 with temperature, light, and nutrients, respectively. Growth rates mostly respond non‐additively, whereby the interaction with increased p CO 2 profusely dampens growth‐enhancing effects of high temperature and high light. Multiple and single driver effects on coccolithophores differ from other phytoplankton groups, especially in their high sensitivity to increasing p CO 2 . Polar species decrease their growth rate in response to high p CO 2 , while temperate and tropical species benefit under these conditions. Based on the observed interactions and projected changes, we anticipate primary productivity to: (a) first increase but eventually decrease in the Arctic Ocean once nutrient limitation outweighs the benefits of higher light availability; (b) decrease in the tropics and mid‐latitudes due to intensifying nutrient limitation, possibly amplified by elevated p CO 2 and (c) increase in the Southern Ocean in view of higher nutrient availability and synergistic interaction with increasing p CO 2 . Growth‐enhancing effect of high light and warming to coccolithophores, mainly Emiliania huxleyi , might increase their relative abundance as long as not offset by acidification. Dinoflagellates are expected to increase their relative abundance due to their positive growth response to ... |
|---|