Applications of random forest feature selection for fine‐scale genetic population assignment

Abstract Genetic population assignment used to inform wildlife management and conservation efforts requires panels of highly informative genetic markers and sensitive assignment tests. We explored the utility of machine‐learning algorithms (random forest, regularized random forest and guided regular...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Evolutionary Applications
Main Authors: Sylvester, Emma V. A., Bentzen, Paul, Bradbury, Ian R., Clément, Marie, Pearce, Jon, Horne, John, Beiko, Robert G.
Other Authors: Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eva.12524
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Feva.12524
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/eva.12524
Description
Summary:Abstract Genetic population assignment used to inform wildlife management and conservation efforts requires panels of highly informative genetic markers and sensitive assignment tests. We explored the utility of machine‐learning algorithms (random forest, regularized random forest and guided regularized random forest) compared with F ST ranking for selection of single nucleotide polymorphisms ( SNP ) for fine‐scale population assignment. We applied these methods to an unpublished SNP data set for Atlantic salmon ( Salmo salar ) and a published SNP data set for Alaskan Chinook salmon ( Oncorhynchus tshawytscha ). In each species, we identified the minimum panel size required to obtain a self‐assignment accuracy of at least 90% using each method to create panels of 50–700 markers Panels of SNP s identified using random forest‐based methods performed up to 7.8 and 11.2 percentage points better than F ST ‐selected panels of similar size for the Atlantic salmon and Chinook salmon data, respectively. Self‐assignment accuracy ≥90% was obtained with panels of 670 and 384 SNP s for each data set, respectively, a level of accuracy never reached for these species using F ST ‐selected panels. Our results demonstrate a role for machine‐learning approaches in marker selection across large genomic data sets to improve assignment for management and conservation of exploited populations.