Lifetime low behavioural plasticity of personality traits in the common vole ( Microtus arvalis) under laboratory conditions

• Published in: Ethology
• Main Authors: Urbánková, Gabriela, Šíchová, Klára, Riegert, Jan, Horsley, Rachel, Mladěnková, Nella, Starck‐Lantová, Petra, Sedláček, František
• Other Authors: Goymann, Wolfgang, Ministry of Education, Youth, and Sport of the Czech Republic
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: Wiley 2020
• Subjects: Common vole; Microtus arvalis
• Online Access: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eth.13039; https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Feth.13039; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/eth.13039; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.1111/eth.13039

Abstract Individual differences in behaviour, referred to as animal personality, are consistent across time and contexts. Nevertheless, personality traits show behavioural plasticity, much like many other phenotypic traits. In the present study, we examined the relationship between personality traits and behavioural plasticity in the common vole ( Microtus arvalis ) under stable, long‐lasting laboratory conditions. A total of 94 voles were tested in the classic open field test, designed to measure seven behavioural parameters (distance moved, grooming, immobility, rearing, running, scanning and walking duration) during a three‐minute test. A total of 60 voles formed the experimental group and were tested at four different time points over their lifetime (1st, 3rd, 5th and 7th month); 34 voles formed the control group and were tested only once at the 7th month. All voles were of the same age. Based on principal component analysis (PCA), two ordination axes were determined: “exploration” and “activity.” For further analyses, “distance moved” and “scanning duration” were selected from the first axis and “walking duration” from the second. Using linear mixed‐effect models (LMMs), we found highly significant random intercepts (i.e. personality traits) in all three behavioural parameters. However, evidence for behavioural plasticity was only found in the distance moved parameter, as determined from the random slope, and correlations between personality trait (intercept) and plasticity (slope) were not significant for any trait. During the experiment, variances of random effects were high and remained essentially the same, whilst the rank order of many individuals changed. Based on fixed effect slopes and a comparison with the control group, habituation was only significant for “walking duration.” The observed low behavioural plasticity could mirror stable (laboratory) conditions that result in the manifestation of original trait settings (genetic, early postnatal) or their gradual overcoming. These findings provide a ...