Linking anti‐predator behaviour to prey demography reveals limited risk effects of an actively hunting large carnivore

Abstract Ecological theory predicts that the diffuse risk cues generated by wide‐ranging, active predators should induce prey behavioural responses but not major, population‐ or community‐level consequences. We evaluated the non‐consumptive effects ( NCE s) of an active predator, the grey wolf ( Can...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ecology Letters
Main Authors: Middleton, Arthur D., Kauffman, Matthew J., McWhirter, Douglas E., Jimenez, Michael D., Cook, Rachel C., Cook, John G., Albeke, Shannon E., Sawyer, Hall, White, P. J.
Other Authors: Festa‐Bianchet, Marco
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ele.12133
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fele.12133
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/ele.12133
Description
Summary:Abstract Ecological theory predicts that the diffuse risk cues generated by wide‐ranging, active predators should induce prey behavioural responses but not major, population‐ or community‐level consequences. We evaluated the non‐consumptive effects ( NCE s) of an active predator, the grey wolf ( Canis lupus ), by simultaneously tracking wolves and the behaviour, body fat, and pregnancy of elk ( Cervus elaphus ), their primary prey in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem. When wolves approached within 1 km, elk increased their rates of movement, displacement and vigilance. Even in high‐risk areas, however, these encounters occurred only once every 9 days. Ultimately, despite 20‐fold variation in the frequency of encounters between wolves and individual elk, the risk of predation was not associated with elk body fat or pregnancy. Our findings suggest that the ecological consequences of actively hunting large carnivores, such as the wolf, are more likely transmitted by consumptive effects on prey survival than NCE s on prey behaviour.