Failure of predator conditioning: an experimental study of predator avoidance in brown trout ( Salmo trutta)

Abstract Many studies have documented that hatchery‐reared salmonids generally have inferior survival after being stocked compared with wild conspecifics, hatchery and wild salmonids have been observed to differ in their antipredator responses. The response of brown trout ( Salmo trutta ) juveniles...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ecology of Freshwater Fish
Main Authors: Petersson, Erik, Valencia, Ana Camargo, Järvi, Torbjörn
Other Authors: Swedish Board of Fisheries
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eff.12146
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Feff.12146
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/eff.12146
Description
Summary:Abstract Many studies have documented that hatchery‐reared salmonids generally have inferior survival after being stocked compared with wild conspecifics, hatchery and wild salmonids have been observed to differ in their antipredator responses. The response of brown trout ( Salmo trutta ) juveniles (0+) of differing backgrounds to a live predator was compared in two experiments. First, the antipredator behaviour of predator‐naïve hatchery‐reared brown trout and wild‐exposed brown trout were assessed in behavioural trials which lasted for eight days. Second, predator‐naïve and predator‐conditioned hatchery‐reared brown trout were assessed in identical behavioural trials. Brown trout were ‘predator‐conditioned’ by being held in a stream‐water aquarium with adult Atlantic salmon ( Salmo salar ) and adult brown trout for two days prior to behavioural trials. Predator‐conditioned hatchery‐reared brown trout spent more time in shelters in the trial aquaria than predator‐naïve hatchery‐reared fish, but did not differ in time spent in the predator‐free area. Predator conditioning may account for the increased time spent in the shelter, but does not appear to have affected time spent in the predator‐free area. However, even if significant alteration in behaviour can be noted in the laboratory, the response might not be appropriate in the wild.