Multicolony tracking reveals potential threats to little auks wintering in the North Atlantic from marine pollution and shrinking sea ice cover
Abstract Aim Extensive development of human activities in combination with ocean warming is rapidly modifying marine habitats in the A rctic and N orth A tlantic regions. To understand the potential impacts on marine biodiversity, there is an urgent need to determine distributions and habitat prefer...
Published in: | Diversity and Distributions |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2013
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12105 https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fddi.12105 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/ddi.12105 |
Summary: | Abstract Aim Extensive development of human activities in combination with ocean warming is rapidly modifying marine habitats in the A rctic and N orth A tlantic regions. To understand the potential impacts on marine biodiversity, there is an urgent need to determine distributions and habitat preferences of potentially vulnerable species and to identify sensitive hotspots that might require particular protection. Our aims were to track one of the most abundant seabirds of the world, the little auk ( A lle alle ), to provide a large, meta‐population scale overview of its non‐breeding distribution and to document potential threats to this species from human activities and other environmental changes. Location Arctic N orth A tlantic. Methods Using light‐level geolocators, we investigated the 2010/11 non‐breeding distribution of 65 little auks from four major colonies distributed throughout the A rctic N orth A tlantic. Bird distribution during the moulting, wintering and pre‐breeding periods was compared with (1) the extent of the marginal ice zone and (2) the areas covered by the main shipping lanes and oil and gas activity licences. Results We identify several hotspots for this species, including two key areas located in the G reenland S ea and off N ewfoundland. Crucially, we show that some of these hotspots overlap extensively with areas of intensive human activities, including oil and gas extraction and shipping. As little auks, which spend the major part of their time on the sea surface, are extremely vulnerable to marine pollution, our results emphasize the risk associated with the projected expansion of these activities. Main conclusions We conclude that management of further human enterprises in the Arctic needs to be based on more thorough risk assessment, requiring a substantial improvement in our knowledge of the distribution of sensitive species. |
---|