A multidisciplinary approach to estimating wolf population size for long‐term conservation

Abstract The wolf ( Canis lupus ) is among the most controversial of wildlife species. Abundance estimates are required to inform public debate and policy decisions, but obtaining them at biologically relevant scales is challenging. We developed a system for comprehensive population estimation acros...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Conservation Biology
Main Authors: Marucco, Francesca, Boiani, Maria V., Dupont, Pierre, Milleret, Cyril, Avanzinelli, Elisa, Pilgrim, Kristine, Schwartz, Michael K., von Hardenberg, Achaz, Perrone, Domenica Serena, Friard, Olivier P., Menzano, Arianna, Bisi, Francesco, Fattori, Umberto, Tomasella, Michela, Calderola, Sonia, Carolfi, Sabrina, Ferrari, Piero, Chioso, Christian, Truc, Fabrizio, Bombieri, Giulia, Pedrotti, Luca, Righetti, Davide, Acutis, Pierluigi L., Guglielmo, Fabio, Hauffe, Heidi C., Rossi, Chiara, Caniglia, Romolo, Aragno, Paola, La Morgia, Valentina, Genovesi, Piero, Bischof, Richard
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2023
Subjects:
Canis lupus
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cobi.14132
Description
Summary:Abstract The wolf ( Canis lupus ) is among the most controversial of wildlife species. Abundance estimates are required to inform public debate and policy decisions, but obtaining them at biologically relevant scales is challenging. We developed a system for comprehensive population estimation across the Italian alpine region (100,000 km 2 ), involving 1513 trained operators representing 160 institutions. This extensive network allowed for coordinated genetic sample collection and landscape‐level spatial capture–recapture analyses that transcended administrative boundaries to produce the first estimates of key parameters for wolf population status assessment. Wolf abundance was estimated at 952 individuals (95% credible interval 816–1120) and 135 reproductive units (i.e., packs) (95% credible interval 112–165). We also estimated that mature individuals accounted for 33–45% of the entire population. The monitoring effort was spatially estimated thereby overcoming an important limitation of citizen science data. This is an important approach for promoting wolf–human coexistence based on wolf abundance monitoring and an endorsement of large‐scale harmonized conservation practices.

Similar Items