A counterfactual approach to measure the impact of wet grassland conservation on U.K. breeding bird populations

• Published in: Conservation Biology
• Main Authors: Jellesmark, Sean, Ausden, Malcolm, Blackburn, Tim M., Gregory, Richard D., Hoffmann, Mike, Massimino, Dario, McRae, Louise, Visconti, Piero
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: Wiley 2021
• Subjects: Numenius arquata; Vanellus vanellus
• Online Access: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13692; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/cobi.13692; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.1111/cobi.13692

Abstract Wet grassland populations of wading birds in the United Kingdom have declined severely since 1990. To help mitigate these declines, the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds has restored and managed lowland wet grassland nature reserves to benefit these and other species. However, the impact of these reserves on bird population trends has not been evaluated experimentally due to a lack of control populations. We compared population trends from 1994 to 2018 among 5 bird species of conservation concern that breed on these nature reserves with counterfactual trends created from matched breeding bird survey observations. We compared reserve trends with 3 different counterfactuals based on different scenarios of how reserve populations could have developed in the absence of conservation. Effects of conservation interventions were positive for all 4 targeted wading bird species: Lapwing ( Vanellus vanellus ), Redshank ( Tringa totanus ), Curlew ( Numenius arquata ), and Snipe ( Gallinago gallinago ). There was no positive effect of conservation interventions on reserves for the passerine, Yellow Wagtail ( Motacilla flava ). Our approach using monitoring data to produce valid counterfactual controls is a broadly applicable method allowing large‐scale evaluation of conservation impact.