Relative influence of human harvest, carnivores, and weather on adult female elk survival across western North America

• Published in: Journal of Applied Ecology
• Main Authors: Brodie, Jedediah, Johnson, Heather, Mitchell, Michael, Zager, Peter, Proffitt, Kelly, Hebblewhite, Mark, Kauffman, Matthew, Johnson, Bruce, Bissonette, John, Bishop, Chad, Gude, Justin, Herbert, Jeff, Hersey, Kent, Hurley, Mark, Lukacs, Paul M., McCorquodale, Scott, McIntire, Eliot, Nowak, Josh, Sawyer, Hall, Smith, Douglas, White, P.J.
• Other Authors: Stephens, Phil, US Geological Survey
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: Wiley 2013
• Subjects: Canis lupus
• Online Access: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12044; https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2F1365-2664.12044; https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/1365-2664.12044

Summary Well‐informed management of harvested species requires understanding how changing ecological conditions affect demography and population dynamics, information that is lacking for many species. We have limited understanding of the relative influence of carnivores, harvest, weather and forage availability on elk Cervus elaphus demography, despite the ecological and economic importance of this species. We assessed adult female survival, a key vital rate for population dynamics, from 2746 radio‐collared elk in 45 populations across western North America that experience wide variation in carnivore assemblage, harvest, weather and habitat conditions. Proportional hazard analysis revealed that ‘baseline’ (i.e. not related to human factors) mortality was higher with very high winter precipitation, particularly in populations sympatric with wolves Canis lupus . Mortality may increase via nutritional stress and heightened vulnerability to predation in snowy winters. Baseline mortality was unrelated to puma Puma concolor presence, forest cover or summer forage productivity. Cause‐specific mortality analyses showed that wolves and all carnivore species combined had additive effects on baseline elk mortality, but only reduced survival by <2%. When human factors were included, ‘total’ adult mortality was solely related to harvest; the influence of native carnivores was compensatory. Annual total mortality rates were lowest in populations sympatric with both pumas and wolves because managers reduced female harvest in areas with abundant or diverse carnivores. Mortality from native carnivores peaked in late winter and early spring, while harvest‐induced mortality peaked in autumn. The strong peak in harvest‐induced mortality during the autumn hunting season decreased as the number of native carnivore species increased. Synthesis and applications . Elevated baseline adult female elk mortality from wolves in years with high winter precipitation could affect elk abundance as winters across the western US become drier ...