Dominant bryophyte control over high‐latitude soil temperature fluctuations predicted by heat transfer traits, field moisture regime and laws of thermal insulation

• Published in: Functional Ecology
• Main Authors: Soudzilovskaia, Nadejda A., van Bodegom, Peter M., Cornelissen, Johannes H.C.
• Other Authors: Schweitzer, Jennifer, NWO
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: Wiley 2013
• Subjects: Arctic; permafrost; Subarctic; Tundra
• Online Access: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.12127; https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2F1365-2435.12127; https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/1365-2435.12127

Summary Bryophytes cover large territories in cold biomes, where they control soil temperature regime, and therefore permafrost, carbon and nutrient dynamics. The mechanisms of this control remain unclear. We quantified the dependence of soil temperature fluctuations under bryophyte mats on the interplay of bryophyte heat conductance traits, mat thickness, density and moisture regimes. For seventeen predominant bryophytes in six typical subarctic ecosystems, we assessed in situ soil temperature dynamics under bryophyte mats in comparison with bryophyte‐removal patches and per‐species mat field moisture. In a complimentary laboratory investigation, we studied how per‐species bryophyte thermal conductivity and volumetric heat capacity depend on mat density and moisture content. Subsequently, we tested whether heat transfer through bryophyte mats could be modelled as a function of mat thickness, thermal conductivity and volumetric heat capacity, the latter two being determined by mat density and field moisture content. Laboratory assessment revealed that bryophyte thermal conductivity and volumetric heat capacity were independent of mat density, and depended linearly on mat moisture content, but the dependencies were not species‐specific. In the field, bryophytes reduced amplitudes of soil temperature fluctuations and freeze–thaw frequency during the growing season, but not mean soil temperature. These effects differed between species and between ecosystems, being strongest in Sphagnum fuscum ‐dominated dry tundra, but were well explained by bryophyte mat thickness and field moisture content as affecting thermal conductivity and volumetric heat capacity. We suggest that reduction in soil temperature amplitudes is a generic feature in (sub) arctic ecosystems and should be considered as an important mechanism of bryophyte control on carbon and nutrient turnover. Although heat transfer through bryophyte mats differs greatly among species and ecosystems, species differences are fully explained by differences in mat ...