Host specificity in parasitic mistletoes (Loranthaceae) in New Zealand

• Published in: Functional Ecology
• Main Authors: Norton, D. A., De Lange, P. J.
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: Wiley 1999
• Subjects: Antarc*; Antarctica
• Online Access: http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2435.1999.00347.x; https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1046%2Fj.1365-2435.1999.00347.x; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1046/j.1365-2435.1999.00347.x; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.1046/j.1365-2435.1999.00347.x; https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1046/j.1365-2435.1999.00347.x

1. We quantify the degree of host specificity for the five extant New Zealand loranthaceous mistletoes ( Alepis flavida, Ileostylus micranthus, Peraxilla colensoi, Peraxilla tetrapetala and Tupeia antarctica ). 2. Host specificity is highest for A. flavida, P. colensoi and P. tetrapetala which primarily parasitize species of Nothofagus , and lowest for T. antarctica and especially I. micranthus which parasitize a wide range of host species. 3. These patterns of host specificity support the suggestion that relative host abundance is a key factor determining the degree of host specialization in mistletoes (resource fragmentation hypothesis). While evolutionary history may be important in the specificity of the mistletoe–host relationship in some situations, our data suggest that for New Zealand mistletoes evolutionary history simply reflects the temporal component of relative host abundance. 4. We conclude that it is the stability of host availability through time and space which is the dominant factor determining host specificity patterns.