Timing an ontogenetic niche shift: responses of emerging salmon alevins to chemical cues from predators and competitors

• Published in: Oikos
• Main Authors: Jones, Mirkka, Laurila, Anssi, Peuhkuri, Nina, Piironen, Jorma, Seppä, Teija
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: Wiley 2003
• Subjects: Atlantic salmon; Burbot; Lota lota; Salmo salar; lota
• Online Access: http://dx.doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0706.2003.12347.x; https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1034%2Fj.1600-0706.2003.12347.x; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1034/j.1600-0706.2003.12347.x

Ontogenetic niche shifts are ubiquitous in nature. However, in most species little is known about phenotypic plasticity in the timing of shifts and in the associated characters. Following a period of endogenous feeding on yolk, salmonid alevins emerge from their gravel nests into the open water and start feeding exogenously. We studied, by using replicated artificial nests, whether the responses of emerging Atlantic salmon ( Salmo salar ) alevins to chemical cues from two piscivorous fish predators and conspecific competitors are plastic. We hypothesised that the alevins should delay emergence in response to predator cues, whereas cues from competitors should induce earlier emergence. We found that chemical cues from predatory burbot ( Lota lota ) delayed emergence, whereas cues from brown trout ( S. trutta ) tended to induce earlier emergence. The earlier emergence in response to trout cues was associated with a smaller body size and more yolk resources remaining at emergence, but burbot cues did not alter these traits. Predator cues also influenced the daily pattern of emergence: more alevins emerged during the morning in the burbot treatment, and fewer alevins emerged during the afternoon in the trout treatment. Chemical cues from conspecific competitors had no effect on emergence patterns. The results indicate that salmon alevins exhibit flexible ontogenetic niche shifts in the timing of emergence in response to predator cues, and that the responses are predator‐specific. As timing of emergence is a major determinant of territory acquisition, these responses are likely to have an impact on later fitness of the fry.