Food intake and mass gain of hand‐reared brown bear cubs

Abstract Five orphaned European brown bear cubs ( Ursus arctos ) from 3 litters were hand‐reared from the ages of 1–4 months. Body mass initially ranged from 1.7 to 2.8 kg. Growth rates were monitored with reference to diet. Over a period of 3 years, 6 different feed formulas were used. The first 4...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Zoo Biology
Main Authors: Huber, Djuro, Kulier, Ignac, Poljak, Andrea, Devčić‐Kuhar, Branka
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 1993
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/zoo.1430120604
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1002%2Fzoo.1430120604
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/zoo.1430120604
Description
Summary:Abstract Five orphaned European brown bear cubs ( Ursus arctos ) from 3 litters were hand‐reared from the ages of 1–4 months. Body mass initially ranged from 1.7 to 2.8 kg. Growth rates were monitored with reference to diet. Over a period of 3 years, 6 different feed formulas were used. The first 4 formulas were given with bottles until an average age of 133 days. Conversion to mass in the first 10 months ranged from 3.5 to 32.0 g of food per gram of body mass (or 38.1–192.6 kJ of gross energy/gram body mass), and was affected by type of diet. High fat content increased, whereas high carbohydrate content decreased the conversion rates. Formula 3, with 12.0% protein, 23.9% fat, and only 0.2% carbohydrates, simulated values found in bears' milk and produced the best growth rates. Formula 6 (bread, fruits, and meat) was used from ages 7 to 35 months, and over this period, the efficiency of gross energy conversion decreased gradually, by an eventual factor of 3.8. Hand‐reared cubs ranged from 1.3 to 2.7 times heavier than 17 wild cubs measured at matching ages. Wild mass is probably limited by maternal hibernation, and by the largely herbivorous nature of the diet. © 1993 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.