Compound‐specific stable carbon isotope ratios (δ 13 C values) of the halogenated natural product 2,3,3′,4,4′,5,5′‐heptachloro‐1′‐methyl‐1,2′‐bipyrrole (Q1)

Abstract Compound‐specific isotope analysis using gas chromatography interfaced to isotope ratio mass spectrometry (GC/IRMS) was applied for the determination of δ 13 C values of the marine halogenated natural product 2,3,3′,4,4′,5,5′‐heptachloro‐1′‐methyl‐1,2′‐bipyrrole (Q1). The δ 13 C value of a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry
Main Authors: Vetter, Walter, Gleixner, Gerd
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2006
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rcm.2686
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1002%2Frcm.2686
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/rcm.2686
Description
Summary:Abstract Compound‐specific isotope analysis using gas chromatography interfaced to isotope ratio mass spectrometry (GC/IRMS) was applied for the determination of δ 13 C values of the marine halogenated natural product 2,3,3′,4,4′,5,5′‐heptachloro‐1′‐methyl‐1,2′‐bipyrrole (Q1). The δ 13 C value of a lab‐made Q1 standard (−34.20 ± 0.27‰) was depleted in 13 C by more than 11‰ relative to the residues of Q1 in dolphin blubber from Australia and skua liver from Antarctica. This clarified that the synthesized Q1 was not the source for Q1 in the biota samples. However, two Australian marine mammals showed a large variation in the δ 13 C value, which, in our experience, was implausible. Since the GC/IRMS system was connected to a conventional ion trap mass spectrometer by a post‐column splitter, we were able to closely inspect the peak purity of Q1 in the respective samples. While the mass spectra of Q1 did not indicate any impurity, a fronting peak of PCB 101 was identified in one sample. This interference falsified the δ 13 C value of the respective sample. Once this sample was excluded, we found that the δ 13 C values of the remaining samples, i.e. liver of Antarctic brown skua (−21.47 ± 1.47‰) and blubber of Australian melon‐headed whale (−22.80 ± 0.33‰), were in the same order. The standard deviation for Q1 was larger in the skua samples than in the standard and the whale blubber sample. This was due to lower amounts of skua sample available. It remained unclear if the Q1 residues originate from the same producer and location. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.