A method to detect allergenic fish, specifically cod and pollock, using quantitative real‐time PCR and COI DNA barcoding sequences

Abstract BACKGROUND Fish are one of eight major allergens defined in the US Food Allergen Labeling and Consumer Protection Act, and cod and pollock are two of the major fish allergens. This paper describes development and validation of a method to detect cod and pollock in complex food matrices usin...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture
Main Author: Eischeid, Anne C
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.9466
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1002%2Fjsfa.9466
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/jsfa.9466
Description
Summary:Abstract BACKGROUND Fish are one of eight major allergens defined in the US Food Allergen Labeling and Consumer Protection Act, and cod and pollock are two of the major fish allergens. This paper describes development and validation of a method to detect cod and pollock in complex food matrices using real‐time polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase I (COI) sequences obtained through DNA barcoding were used to design a single set of primers and probe which detected three species in the genus Gadus : Atlantic cod, Pacific cod, and walleye pollock. RESULTS Cod spiked into three different food matrices (cooking oil, clam chowder, and hushpuppy mix) yielded high linearity, dynamic range spanning six orders of magnitude, and lower limits of detection at 1–10 ppm (ppm; mg kg −1 ). Frying had an adverse effect on the lower limit of detection, but not on linearity. CONCLUSIONS This work shows that COI DNA barcoding sequences can be used to effectively design real‐time PCR assays for detection of food allergens in complex matrices. While full‐length DNA barcodes distinguish individual species, the PCR assay designed here detected three different species. This is likely because real‐time PCR assays are tolerant to basepair mismatches and do not utilize the full length of the DNA barcode. Published 2018. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.