Potential critical sources of error in the analysis of microcharcoal in Greenlandic palynological samples – an initial study

Abstract It is common practice to count charcoal particles alongside pollen and non‐pollen palynomorphs in palynological samples. The classification of material as charcoal is dependent upon a number of morphological criteria which, in certain geological zones, could be misclassified. In a prelimina...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Quaternary Science
Main Authors: Krüger, S., Schnetger, B., Strunk, A., Jessen, C.
Other Authors: Carlsbergfondet
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jqs.3494
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/jqs.3494
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.1002/jqs.3494
Description
Summary:Abstract It is common practice to count charcoal particles alongside pollen and non‐pollen palynomorphs in palynological samples. The classification of material as charcoal is dependent upon a number of morphological criteria which, in certain geological zones, could be misclassified. In a preliminary study we tested the effects of different preparation techniques on the count result of charcoal from the same samples of Greenland lake sediments. We demonstrate that the use of hydrofluoric acid has a major impact on the number of recorded charcoal particles. We show that detrital biotite is responsible for a large fraction of the particles misclassified as charcoal and suggest that by using a neodymium magnet any inaccuracy can be minimised. This protocol was then applied to further samples which removed the biotite fraction from the total charcoal count.